Comments on: Carcassonne: Amazonas Review https://www.boardgamequest.com/carcassonne-amazonas-review/ Board Game Reviews, News and More Wed, 26 Apr 2017 23:44:50 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3 By: Tahsin Shamma https://www.boardgamequest.com/carcassonne-amazonas-review/#comment-83380 Wed, 26 Apr 2017 23:44:50 +0000 http://www.boardgamequest.com/?p=21555#comment-83380 In reply to Luke Hector (@TheBrokenMeeple).

That was my original understanding as well Luke, but it just didn’t work out to a real tense race. It just depends on who gets the tiles.

]]> By: Luke Hector (@TheBrokenMeeple) https://www.boardgamequest.com/carcassonne-amazonas-review/#comment-83379 Wed, 26 Apr 2017 23:26:25 +0000 http://www.boardgamequest.com/?p=21555#comment-83379 Hang on, don’t you advance down the river for each boat symbol on a stream when you place a meeple on it, or connect a boat token to one you already have claimed? I think the rules say that if I’m not wrong and that can create some big leaps.

]]> By: Rich https://www.boardgamequest.com/carcassonne-amazonas-review/#comment-83337 Fri, 24 Feb 2017 22:45:19 +0000 http://www.boardgamequest.com/?p=21555#comment-83337 Thanks for the review. I really liked South Seas but Gold Rush felt to me a little like it didn’t vastly alter mechanics enough to require an entire game rather than an expansion. From this review it sounds like Amazonas suffers on the same way and could have easily been an expansion instead for the little variation it offers.

]]>